I played Battlefield 6 during both weeks of its Open Beta, testing Conquest, Breakthrough, Domination, King of the Hill, Close Quarters, Rush, and the new Empire State map. The large-scale chaos finally felt familiar again.In Week 2, additional upscaling options made the graphics look sharper, although several beta bugs remained. This review focuses on the gunplay, vehicle balance, sound design, PC performance, and what I hoped to see in the full release.
Battlefield 6 Open Beta Narrated Review
My review of Battlefield 6 is also available as a narrated video in Indonesian. It provides a shorter version of these impressions. is also available as a narrated video in Indonesian, with a shorter version of these impressions. Click here to visit my gaming channel, or watch the video embedded below.
Battlefield 6 Open Beta Multiplayer Gameplay Week 1
Battlefield 6 Open Beta Multiplayer Gameplay Week 2
Busy Modes and Familiar Chaos
Battlefield 6 Open Beta offered a wide selection of modes across the two weeks, including Conquest, Breakthrough, Closed Weapon Conquest, Domination, King of the Hill, and Close Quarters. Squad Deathmatch and Rush were also playable, although still in beta.
The selection of modes didn’t change much between the weeks. Week 2 did add Empire State and improved graphical sharpness through new upscaling choices. Weekly challenges also let players earn cosmetic items intended to unlock after the game’s official launch.
Each mode was chaotic in an entertaining way. Teamwork mattered, but coordination was often improvised rather than carefully planned. Those unpredictable large-scale fights reminded me of what I enjoy about Battlefield.
Weapon Progression and the Class System
Progression was already active in the beta. I could unlock weapons and attachments, adjust loadouts, and play the traditional Assault, Medic, Engineer, and Recon classes.
Each class had a distinct identity. Assault’s NVO-228E felt solid, Engineer’s PW72A had very little noticeable recoil, and the Medic’s MP17 A2 carbine hit hard. I didn’t find a sniper rifle I was entirely comfortable with, but the weapons generally suited their respective roles.
Vehicles also felt more balanced. Tanks moved slowly, carried limited ammunition, and had heavily protected areas, although they weren’t as realistic as Battlefield 1. That made them less useful as long-range sniping platforms. Helicopters were more constrained by gravity, while jets reminded me of a simplified flight simulator such as War Thunder. They were harder to control, less durable, and less accurate. Overall, I thought those changes made land and air combat fairer.
Maps and World Design
Battlefield 6 featured four playable maps: Siege of Cairo, Iberian Offensive, Liberation Peak, and Empire State, which arrived in Week 2. Their scale felt suitable for 64 players and vehicles, offering room to maneuver without making every objective feel far away.
Each map had its own character:
- Siege of Cairo: Dense urban streets and buildings for cover, along with a glitch that let players reach rooftops they shouldn’t have accessed.
- Iberian Offensive: A semi-open mix of villages and hills, well suited to mid-range encounters and sniping.
- Liberation Peak: Mountainous terrain and narrow routes that create vertical combat.
- Empire State (Week 2): An American city environment with tall buildings and a more modern urban feel.
The Battlefield 6 maps felt convincing, with debris, objects, and structures offering cover. Building destruction also returned on a larger scale than I remembered in Battlefield 5. Grenades, rockets, and tank shells could tear through walls and bring sections down. The result was a chaotic battlefield that looked and felt dynamic.
Several beta glitches remained. A player could fall through the map and die, for instance, while a rooftop exploit on Siege of Cairo enabled attacks from unexpected positions. These were precisely the sorts of issues I hoped the developers would address before launch.
Visuals and Performance
Visually, Battlefield 6 Open Beta surprised me. Compared with Battlefield 2042, the environment looked more detailed and the presentation felt far more polished.
Visual Details
- Environments: Debris, foliage, damaged structures, and explosion marks make every map feel more believable. Grenades send dust and fragments into the air.
- Lighting: Sunlight on Empire State and shadows around Siege of Cairo make the fighting look more dramatic without feeling overly artificial.
- Characters and Weapons: Character models look more polished, with convincing reload and recoil animations. The weapons have visible material details, including marks on metal surfaces.
Destruction is another highlight. Buildings can break apart progressively rather than disappear in one scripted event. A position that appears safe can become rubble as a fight unfolds.
PC Performance On my high-end PC, I ran the beta at Ultra settings. Frame rates were generally stable even during busy fights, although I noticed a few limitations:
- DLSS Frame Generation (x2–x4): Caused stuttering and uneven motion for me in Week 2, despite its intended FPS gains.
- DLAA: Was the more reliable option in my sessions, keeping the image sharp without introducing the stutter I noticed with Frame Generation.
- Stability: Overall performance was more consistent than I experienced in Battlefield 2042 near its troubled launch.
Visual Bugs
The beta still had graphical and collision bugs. I saw characters fall through the terrain, and a Siege of Cairo exploit let players reach rooftops they shouldn’t have been able to access. Those issues could undermine fair matches if left unresolved.
Visuals and Performance Verdict
Battlefield 6 Open Beta was much closer to the visual standard I wanted from the series. Detailed environments, cinematic effects, and extensive destruction made the fighting convincing. The beta still had glitches and uneven DLSS Frame Generation, but the base performance gave me reason to be optimistic about further improvements.
Audio and Music
The weapons in Battlefield 6 sounded powerful and realistic to me. Positional audio helped me pick out enemy footsteps, especially in enclosed or relatively quiet spaces.
The soundtrack was a pleasant surprise. It reminded me of Battlefield 3 and Battlefield 4. Vehicle and explosion sounds also recreated the overwhelming atmosphere I associated with the series’ best large battles.
Cinematic Chaos
One of the most memorable beta moments came when explosions, vehicles, and soldiers collided around a contested point. It looked like an action-film sequence, but I was playing it rather than watching it. That was the kind of Battlefield chaos I had missed.
Gunplay struck a balance between accessible arcade-style handling and a touch of realism. Attachments offered useful differences without making the basic controls difficult to learn, which I appreciated as someone familiar with the series.
Recommendations and Expectations
After two weeks with the beta, I felt Battlefield 6 had a stronger foundation than Battlefield 2042. The battles were exciting, the visuals clearer, the sound more convincing, and the vehicles more balanced.Still, these issues needed attention before the full release:
- Graphics Optimization
The game could still be demanding. Although my high-end PC handled it well, Frame Generation sometimes caused stuttering. I wanted EA to make the game run consistently across a wider range of hardware. - Limited Map Selection
At the time, reports suggested there might be only around nine maps at the full launch. I felt that would be too few for a Battlefield game if true, given how important varied environments are to long-term play. - Monetization and Battle Pass
A large emphasis on cosmetic items and a battle pass concerned me. I didn’t want the size of the game to grow through skins while more important additions such as maps and modes received less attention. - Legacy and Player Trust
Battlefield 2042’s disappointing launch left players skeptical. The beta was encouraging, but I wanted EA to demonstrate that it had learned from the earlier criticism through its full release and post-launch support. - Price and Value
If launch pricing was around Rp800,000, the quality I saw could have justified it. Still, considering the series’ recent history, I personally recommended not pre-ordering and waiting for launch-day reviews or footage from the wider community.
Overall, I felt Battlefield 6 had moved in the right direction. Its large-scale combat reminded me of the franchise’s roots, with better environmental destruction and much more satisfying presentation than Battlefield 2042. The full release still needed to prove the developers could sustain that momentum.
Conclusion Battlefield 6 Open Beta
Weeks 1 and 2 of Battlefield 6 Open Beta were promising. Large-scale combat returned with stronger visuals, more convincing audio, and vehicles that seemed better balanced than in previous entries.
Bugs and monetization concerns remained, but I came away hoping the game could help revive the series. I didn’t plan to pre-order it and preferred waiting to see how the full release performed. Longtime Battlefield fans had good reason to be interested; more casual players could reasonably wait for final reviews before buying.
